skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Search for: All records

Creators/Authors contains: "Luchko, Tyler"

Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

  1. Free, publicly-accessible full text available November 1, 2025
  2. Hydration free energies of small molecules are commonly used as benchmarks for solvation models. However, errors in predicting hydration free energies are partially due to the force fields used and not just the solvation model. To address this, we have used the 3D reference interaction site model (3D-RISM) of molecular solvation and existing benchmark explicit solvent calculations with a simple element count correction (ECC) to identify problems with the non-bond parameters in the general AMBER force field (GAFF). 3D-RISM was used to calculate hydration free energies of all 642 molecules in the FreeSolv database, and a partial molar volume correction (PMVC), ECC, and their combination (PMVECC) were applied to the results. The PMVECC produced a mean unsigned error of 1.01±0.04kcal/mol and root mean squared error of 1.44±0.07kcal/mol, better than the benchmark explicit solvent calculations from FreeSolv, and required less than 15 s of computing time per molecule on a single CPU core. Importantly, parameters for PMVECC showed systematic errors for molecules containing Cl, Br, I, and P. Applying ECC to the explicit solvent hydration free energies found the same systematic errors. The results strongly suggest that some small adjustments to the Lennard–Jones parameters for GAFF will lead to improved hydration free energy calculations for all solvent models. 
    more » « less
  3. The solvent can occupy up to ∼70% of macromolecular crystals, and hence, having models that predict solvent distributions in periodic systems could improve the interpretation of crystallographic data. Yet, there are few implicit solvent models applicable to periodic solutes, and crystallographic structures are commonly solved assuming a flat solvent model. Here, we present a newly developed periodic version of the 3D-reference interaction site model (RISM) integral equation method that is able to solve efficiently and describe accurately water and ion distributions in periodic systems; the code can compute accurate gradients that can be used in minimizations or molecular dynamics simulations. The new method includes an extension of the Ornstein–Zernike equation needed to yield charge neutrality for charged solutes, which requires an additional contribution to the excess chemical potential that has not been previously identified; this is an important consideration for nucleic acids or any other charged system where most or all the counter- and co-ions are part of the “disordered” solvent. We present several calculations of proteins, RNAs, and small molecule crystals to show that x-ray scattering intensities and the solvent structure predicted by the periodic 3D-RISM solvent model are in closer agreement with the experiment than are intensities computed using the default flat solvent model in the refmac5 or phenix refinement programs, with the greatest improvement in the 2 to 4 Å range. Prospects for incorporating integral equation models into crystallographic refinement are discussed. 
    more » « less
  4. Abstract The 3D reference interaction site model (3D‐RISM) of molecular solvation is a powerful tool for computing the equilibrium thermodynamics and density distributions of solvents, such as water and co‐ions, around solute molecules. However, 3D‐RISM solutions can be expensive to calculate, especially for proteins and other large molecules where calculating the potential energy between solute and solvent requires more than half the computation time. To address this problem, we have developed and implemented treecode summation for long‐range interactions and analytically corrected cut‐offs for short‐range interactions to accelerate the potential energy and long‐range asymptotics calculations in non‐periodic 3D‐RISM in the AmberTools molecular modeling suite. For the largest single protein considered in this work, tubulin, the total computation time was reduced by a factor of 4. In addition, parallel calculations with these new methods scale almost linearly and the iterative solver remains the largest impediment to parallel scaling. To demonstrate the utility of our approach for large systems, we used 3D‐RISM to calculate the solvation thermodynamics and density distribution of 7‐ring microtubule, consisting of 910 tubulin dimers, over 1.2 million atoms. 
    more » « less
  5. null (Ed.)